<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Scientist Jumps into the Fray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.takeabite.cc/blog/the-new-scientist-jumps-into-the-fray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.takeabite.cc/blog/the-new-scientist-jumps-into-the-fray/</link>
	<description>a project of the Small Planet Institute</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:13:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Price of Meat</title>
		<link>http://www.takeabite.cc/blog/the-new-scientist-jumps-into-the-fray/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Price of Meat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takeabite.cc/?p=473#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad to have found this blog!  

Hope to hear more about the impact of meat on global warming.

It&#039;s too bad that the study about the $20 trillion we could save by reducing consumption of meat isn&#039;t more mainstream.  The world could definitely use $20 trillion for many other things.  

My thoughts are...governments, businesses, or nonprofits should invest in education on low-meat or meatless diets.  

It&#039;s not easy eating less meat when one has eaten it their entire lives.  But if people were informed about the consequences and of alternative, tasty meals, there could be a real cultural shift towards our attitude towards meat...which generally has been hands-off.  Then finally government can address livestock in climate policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad to have found this blog!  </p>
<p>Hope to hear more about the impact of meat on global warming.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad that the study about the $20 trillion we could save by reducing consumption of meat isn&#8217;t more mainstream.  The world could definitely use $20 trillion for many other things.  </p>
<p>My thoughts are&#8230;governments, businesses, or nonprofits should invest in education on low-meat or meatless diets.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not easy eating less meat when one has eaten it their entire lives.  But if people were informed about the consequences and of alternative, tasty meals, there could be a real cultural shift towards our attitude towards meat&#8230;which generally has been hands-off.  Then finally government can address livestock in climate policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

